Which cryptocurrencies are excluded from the MICA Regulation?
Not all cryptocurrencies are regulated by MICA. Find out which assets are excluded from its scope and what regulations apply in Spain.
Read more →
A capital increase in a Spanish private limited company (Sociedad Limitada, SL) is a direct tool to (i) raise funding and (ii) adapt the company’s capital structure to a new business reality (investor entry, balance sheet clean-up, debt conversion, etc.). Legally, the increase can be implemented by creating new participations or by increasing the nominal value of existing ones. The consideration can be cash, assets or rights, receivables against the company, or reserves/profits already within the company.
The practical key is not only “how to do it”, but (i) choosing the right type of increase and (ii) designing the transaction to avoid common startup frictions (dilution disputes, deadlock, valuation arguments, timing issues, and documentation errors).
A) An investor is coming in and you need fresh cash (cash-in).
If you are closing a round (seed, bridge, growth) or adding a new shareholder, a cash increase is the standard route. In an SL, it is common to use a share premium (prima de asunción) to reflect valuation without inflating nominal value (the premium must be fully paid at the time of subscription).
B) You need to avoid (or fix) a serious equity imbalance.
If losses drive net equity below half of share capital, the company may enter a statutory dissolution trigger unless capital is increased or reduced sufficiently (or insolvency proceedings apply). In practice, SLs often use (i) shareholder contributions, (ii) simultaneous reduction and increase (capital “reset”), or (iii) debt-to-equity conversion.
C) You have debt (especially shareholder loans) and want to “clean” the balance sheet.
A set-off of receivables (debt-to-equity conversion) turns payable debt into share capital, improving solvency ratios and aligning incentives (especially if the loan is approaching maturity). In an SL, the receivables to be set off must be fully liquid and due.
D) You contribute strategic assets (IP, software, brand, real estate, shares in another company).
This is useful when the business needs to bring an asset into the corporate perimeter, but it has a critical point: in an SL there is a liability regime regarding the existence and value attributed to non-cash contributions, which can affect shareholders and directors.
E) You only want to strengthen equity “on paper” (without adding cash).
An increase out of reserves does not add liquidity, but it reorders equity and can help with financial optics. It requires a balance sheet within the prior six months, approved and audited (or audited by an auditor appointed by the Registry if there is no auditor).
1) You need cash fast but do not want dilution or a more complex cap table.
In some startups, a loan (or a hybrid instrument) can be more efficient than an immediate increase (especially if valuation is not ready). A capital increase forces you to decide price, premium and subscription rules now.
2) You try to “solve” a shareholder conflict by diluting someone without a solid rationale.
Capital increases designed to selectively dilute a shareholder often trigger corporate disputes. If you need a rebalancing, cleaner tools exist (prior agreements, buyouts, governance restructuring).
3) Weak non-cash contribution (IP without a clear chain of title).
If the asset is poorly documented (title, assignments, encumbrances, licences), the transaction becomes fragile and liability/conflict risk increases.
A capital increase (as a bylaw amendment) generally requires a favourable vote representing more than half of the voting rights attached to the share capital. Certain matters (including limiting or excluding pre-emptive rights) require at least two thirds.
Between the call and the shareholders’ meeting there must be at least 15 days in an SL. If the call is made individually, the timeline is typically counted from the dispatch to the last shareholder.
Spanish law recognises pre-emptive rights in increases where new participations are issued against cash contributions, proportionally to the nominal value already held.
In an SL, the resolution sets the period, but there is a statutory minimum framework depending on how the offer is implemented. The publication requirement can be replaced by individual written notice to shareholders, and the period is counted from that dispatch.
Pre-emptive rights can be transferred under statutory conditions. If participations remain unsubscribed, a second allocation stage usually applies in favour of those who did exercise, and then the possibility to allocate to third parties, subject to the rules and deadlines in the resolution.
Yes, but two things matter:
In startups, this is a frequent friction point: if not anticipated in bylaws/shareholder agreement, a minority can block (or increase the cost of) the closing.
This is the standard structure for investment rounds.
The share premium is the core tool: it allows you to price participations in line with valuation while keeping nominal value stable, and it must be fully paid at subscription.
Simple example (logic, not accounting): if your SL has 3,000 participations of €1 nominal and you agree a €2,000,000 pre-money valuation, the “economic price” per participation is €666.67. For a €200,000 investment, the investor would subscribe roughly 300 participations, paying €1 nominal plus ~€665.67 premium per participation, ending at ~9.09% post-money.
This requires a directors’ report made available from the meeting call, describing and valuing the contribution and detailing participations to be issued, the amount of the increase and the safeguards.
Key startup point: in an SL there is liability around the existence and value of non-cash contributions, and directors may be exposed if value assumptions are unjustified. If the asset is IP or technology, the chain of title and documentation (assignments, licences, encumbrances, repositories) is as important as the valuation figure.
In an SL, the receivables must be fully liquid and due. The deed must identify the creditor and the date of the receivable, and must include the legally required supporting documentation depending on the scenario.
Important: this modality usually does not add cash. It reclassifies debt into equity (useful for solvency, not for runway).
You can only use distributable reserves (and, in an SL, the legal reserve under the applicable conditions) and you need an approved balance sheet within the last six months, audited (or audited by an auditor appointed by the Registry). The deed must include the balance sheet and the auditor’s documentation as required.
At minimum define:
If your SL was incorporated with a very low share capital (e.g., €1), note that it is legally possible, but until you reach €3,000 there are special rules (e.g., legal reserve allocation and shareholder liability in liquidation up to the difference). This can affect investor/bank discussions and dividend policies.
Ensure the required majority (more than half for the increase; two thirds if limiting/excluding pre-emptive rights). The resolution should include:
The deed must reflect the type of increase and its consideration, and include the specific documents required (reports, audited balance sheet, receivable identification and supporting documents, etc.). After registration, publications are made and you update the shareholder register and operational cap table.
Use a share premium as the default.
In startups, nominal value is usually irrelevant. The premium is the clean way to express valuation.
If you are limiting pre-emptive rights, treat it as a potentially contested step.
You need a qualified majority and a solid corporate-interest justification.
Avoid vague non-cash contributions (especially IP) without a clean chain of title.
Poor documentation is a recurring source of disputes.
In debt capitalisation, sell “balance sheet clean-up”, not “cash”.
It is solvency governance, not runway.
Use the shareholders’ agreement to pre-wire waivers and closing mechanics.
Even though the core is in the corporate resolution and deed, the agreement can contain voting commitments, pre-agreed waivers and remedies for breach.
As a general rule, a capital increase (and bylaw amendment) requires a favourable vote representing more than half of the voting rights attached to the share capital.
In an SL, it requires at least two thirds and a proper justification file (directors’ report and corporate-interest rationale).
They apply to increases issuing new participations against cash contributions.
The resolution sets the period, but the statutory framework imposes minimum protections and specific counting rules depending on whether the offer is published or notified individually.
Only if the bylaws allow it and the method ensures receipt by all shareholders.
In an SL, if the increase is not fully subscribed within the stated period, it may still become effective to the extent subscribed unless the resolution expressly states it will be void if incomplete.
Yes, through an increase by set-off of receivables, but in an SL receivables must be liquid and due, and the deed must comply with identification and documentation requirements.
It can be, but only with a clean chain of title and a defensible valuation. In an SL there is liability linked to the existence and the value attributed to non-cash contributions, and it may also affect directors.
It depends. You can legally operate with €1, but until you reach €3,000 special rules apply (legal reserve allocation and liquidation liability up to the difference). Increasing the capital can reduce “reputational friction” in rounds or bank discussions, but it does not replace a solid shareholders’ agreement and a clean round structure.